Basic first aid skills popularization training summary report sample

First, the current public awareness of first aid is that "dare you dare" concerns are far greater than the skill blind spot of "can you do it?", and scenario-based practical training has a much higher priority than theoretical indoctrination.； Second, the first aid needs of different age and occupational groups vary greatly, and there is no universal standardized training template. ； Third, the existing emergency science popularization content is not practical enough and needs to be localized and adjusted based on legal concerns and life scenarios.

This training was organized by the sub-district emergency office in conjunction with the district Red Cross Society. It was originally arranged according to the general courseware process in previous years: 2 hours of theoretical lectures, including cardiac arrest judgment, chest compression standards, and key points of the Heimlich maneuver, and 1 hour was left for practical practice on the simulator. As a result, something happened just 40 minutes into the first lecture. Aunt Zhang, who was sitting in the front row, raised her hand to interrupt, frowning and said, "You said chest compressions should be 5-6 centimeters deep?" With my old arms and legs, if I break someone’s ribs, can I afford to pay for it? I don’t dare to do this kind of work.” The guy from the Internet company sitting next to him also echoed: “Yes, there have been news stories about rescuers being blackmailed before, but you didn’t say in this courseware that if something really happened, should we take responsibility? ”

Don't tell me, as soon as these two questions were raised, several people in the originally packed classroom took out their mobile phones and started browsing, obviously not interested in listening to the operating instructions behind them. Later, we chatted with the lecturer and found out that the industry has actually been arguing about the content sequence of first aid training for a long time: the traditional Red Cross training system is accustomed to talking about operating standards first, for fear that if the movements taught are not standard, accidents will occur, and responsibilities will not be clear. ； But now many groups doing folk science popularization advocate that the first class should first teach the good intention rescue clause of Article 184 of the Civil Code, first to reassure everyone that "as long as you save people voluntarily, you will not be held responsible even if there are small mistakes in the operation." They should first solve the problem of "dare to save" and then talk about "knowledge of saving." We directly adjusted the order in the second period. We spent 20 minutes talking about the exemption clause at the beginning of the lecture. We also used the local news about someone who saved an old man who fainted last year and was thanked by his family as an example. On that day, the number of people who dared to come up and touch the simulator to do practical exercises was 42% more than in the first period. Of course, there are side effects. After hearing this, a young man said, "You don't have to take responsibility for the rescue anyway. I can go up and press randomly." Later, the instructor took him alone to go through the operating procedures for 20 minutes before correcting him. "If you press randomly, you may cause internal injuries. If you can, you should be as standardized as possible. If you are really anxious, it is better not to be perfect than not to do it."

In the third period, we specially added a real-life simulation session and found a staff member to hide behind a tree in the fitness area of ​​the community. When the participants were passing by after the training, there was a sudden "clang" and the person and the thermos cup fell to the ground. Among the 12 people who came forward to rescue, 8 squatted down and wanted to press the button. They even forgot the steps of patting the shoulder to call someone to determine consciousness and squatting down to listen for breathing. The first reaction of 3 people was to find a nearby AED. After running for more than 10 meters, they remembered that no one called 120. On the contrary, a mother with a baby had the smoothest process. She first called someone to call 120, patted her shoulders to determine consciousness, felt her carotid artery to confirm her heartbeat, and the frequency and depth of compressions were basically up to standard. When I asked her later, I found out that when she took her child to a complementary feeding class, the institution had given her a mini first aid class. She was afraid that her child would choke on food, so she took several notes on Heimlich and children's cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which left a deep impression on her.

My biggest feeling after running these four training sessions is that the previously thought of "unified content, unified assessment, and everyone must reach the level of semi-professional first aiders" is simply not realistic. When training a retired elderly person, you told him "the compression frequency should be maintained at 100-120 times/min" and he couldn't remember it. You said just follow the rhythm of "Little Apple" and he hummed it twice and found the feeling. ； Training for young people in office buildings. For a long time, you talked about how to help an elderly person fall down and no one listened. Once you talked about how to save a foreign object stuck in the throat, and how to deal with someone who fainted after staying up late and working overtime, everyone took out their mobile phones to take pictures of the courseware. ； When giving group training to mothers, you will focus on emergency treatment of choking and burns in children. Not only will they listen carefully, but they will also ask you questions about follow-up care for a long time.

Oh, by the way, there is another controversial point that we also got some practical experience of this time: many people in the industry said before that AED (automated external defibrillator) has voice prompts, and no special teaching is required, ordinary people can use it after picking it up. We specially added an AED simulation operation this time. A girl who had just graduated hesitated for three minutes while holding the electrode pads and did not dare to stick them on the simulator, saying she was afraid of sticking them on the wrong person and electrocuting the person. Another older brother came up and wanted to tear off the protective film of the electrode pads, forgetting to wipe off the sweat on the patient's chest first. Later, we calculated that for people who have never practiced AED operation, it takes an average of 1 minute and 40 seconds longer to use it for the first time. This time can really determine life or death in the golden four-minute emergency window. Therefore, our own conclusion is that no matter how simple the operation of the AED is, it is more effective than watching the video ten times if it is touched and practiced once.

To be honest, we didn’t hold any grand graduation ceremony at the end of this training, nor did we issue certificates to everyone. We calculated that more than 90% of the 217 people who participated in the training could remember "call 120 when someone faints, don't shake people casually" and "slap on the back + abdominal shock if something gets stuck in your throat". Even if you only remember these two points, it is actually much better than not knowing anything before. We don’t plan to hold any large-scale training for thousands of people in the future, so we will divide it into small batches and provide customized content for classes for the elderly, office workers, and mothers. After all, if one more person dares to lend a hand when someone else is in trouble, maybe one more life can be saved.